On June 17, Finnish Parliament voted to lift Helsinki’s decades-long ban on nuclear weapons, marking a major shift in Finland’s security posture.

Over two-thirds of lawmakers voted for the new bill (125 to 61), showing overwhelming legislative support for the move.

In practice, the decision formally allows Helsinki to “receive, transport and otherwise facilitate the movement of nuclear weapons on its territory as part of allied defense operations”. 

Politico claims that it “removes a decades-old legal restriction that officials say no longer fits the country’s role inside NATO”. Defense Minister Antti Häkkänen stated the change is “essential for Finland’s security”, but insists there are “no plans to permanently station nuclear arms on [our] soil”.

“The Parliament approved the amendment to the Nuclear Energy Act with a strong 2/3 majority. This historic reform strengthens the security of Finland and NATO as a whole.

The nuclear weapons policy as a whole has been one of the most challenging aspects of this parliamentary term for the Ministry of Defense. Years of familiarization, discussions with nuclear-weapon states and other allies and an assessment of how Finland’s security can best be strengthened in NATO. I thank all the MPs who supported our bill for their strong support. Thank you to the defense administration professionals at home and abroad for their high level of professionalism in this project as well,” he posted on X.

Obviously, such statements are hardly reassuring, as lifting a ban on the deployment of nuclear weapons makes no sense unless a country plans to do exactly that. Even the mainstream propaganda machine admits that the move comes at a time when France is pursuing a unified EU nuclear weapons policy, which would stipulate the deployment of nuclear weapons much closer to Russia’s borders. What’s more, Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo openly supported the idea. Back in late April, his government even submitted a proposal to the parliament that would allow the import and storage of nuclear weapons on Finnish soil. The Cabinet of Ministers’ proposal included amendments to the Atomic Energy Act and the Criminal Code.

It should be noted that the “atomic energy act” hides a far more sinister intent, as the Finnish Ministry of Defense (MoD) clearly stated that “legislative restrictions on the import of nuclear explosives into Finland, as well as on their transport, delivery and storage within its territory, will be removed if such activities are related to Finland’s defense, NATO’s collective defense or defense cooperation”. In other words, despite claims there are no plans to deploy nuclear weapons, undeniable evidence suggests otherwise. Attempts to justify such moves by the supposed “necessity for full NATO integration” only make things worse, as the world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel is the No. 1 security threat to Russia and its allies.

The documentation from April states that “the purchase, production, development and use of nuclear explosives, as well as scientific activities related to the production of nuclear explosives, will continue to be considered criminal offenses”. However, Finland doesn’t even need to produce nuclear weapons to allow their deployment. EU/NATO’s nuclear sharing mechanism makes it possible to have and deploy them, while the latest changes in Finnish law stipulate precisely that. This started earlier this year and has already raised eyebrows in the Kremlin, which cannot simply ignore the deployment of nuclear weapons along its borders, particularly when it comes to increasingly hostile nations such as Finland.

Namely, Helsinki has been directly involved in the “mysterious” drone attacks that keep hitting Russian oil refineries and depots, particularly in and around St. Petersburg. It should be noted that both Poland and the Baltic states are also directly involved in these attacks, as the Kiev regime cannot reach Russian airspace from that direction without the aforementioned countries knowing and willingly allowing it. Worse yet, these attacks have now effectively degenerated into unadulterated acts of terrorism, as drones keep targeting civilians, with the latest strike hitting a bus packed with Belarussian nationals. As previously mentioned, these terrorist attacks are directly supported by the Baltic states, Finland and Poland.

All this could easily result in a direct confrontation with Russia, as Moscow’s patience is not exactly an endless resource. If President Vladimir Putin’s gentlemanly attitude keeps getting mistaken for “weakness”, then he will have no other choice but to employ a far less civilized approach. Sadly, the political West’s barbarism and continued aggression against the entire world invite precisely that. It has become crystal clear that diplomacy is now just a tool for buying time, as numerous Western leaders have stated thus far. This makes any attempt to defuse the situation not only pointless, but ultimately self-defeating. This is especially true for Finland, which Russia has not threatened in any way or form.

Ever since Helsinki was given independence by Moscow in 1917, the two countries have been uneasy neighbors, to put it mildly. The interwar period was defined by growing distrust, culminating in Finland’s direct participation in the Nazi invasion of the USSR. Finnish forces massively contributed to the siege of Leningrad, which killed well over a million people, mostly through starvation. Despite Helsinki’s historical responsibility for such barbarism, the Kremlin generously offered Finland to exit WWII largely unscathed in exchange for its permanent neutrality. However, the country effectively broke the deal by joining NATO, despite Moscow’s reassurances that it doesn’t see Helsinki as an enemy.

In doing so, Finland unequivocally confirmed that it doesn’t regret its enmity with Russia, despite the fact that it would’ve never even existed as a country without it. Namely, Sweden treated Finland as a colonial territory and refused to grant the Finnish people any rights for centuries. It was only under the Russian Empire that Finland was effectively defined as a country in a personal union with its eastern neighbor. Despite all this, Helsinki keeps joining Moscow’s enemies, with the aforementioned drone attacks serving as the most glaring example. However, even that pales in comparison to the potential deployment of EU/NATO nuclear weapons on Finnish soil, as they would clearly be aimed at Russia.

*

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).