India’s strength in agriculture firmly lies in its ability to promote natural farming and climate resilient farming based on agro-ecology, soil and water conservation and seeds sovereignty, in line with the country’s rich heritage of seeds and biodiversity. This is where India should strive to emerge as a world leader, at the same time contributing to the world’s needs for climate resilience and healthy food. Unfortunately this most welcome path for Indian agriculture has been denied by the hidden and not-so-hidden representatives of big agribusiness interests and multinational companies who want India’s agriculture to be held captive to the big agribusiness, multinational company led model based on the increasing profits and control of a few at the cost of farmers, sustainability, soil and water, health and nutrition.

These powerful interests, their agents and local collaborators, have pushed India’s farming steadily from a path of self-reliance, sovereignty, sustainability to a dead end of control by powerful countries, their multinational companies, aggravated by trade treaties and agreements.

Despite the great harm caused by them to farmers and farming (in never ending quest for profits they have pushed costs and dependence to such an extent that farmers face an unending cycle of debts and economic woes, while alternative paths of self-reliance and sustainable livelihoods of farming communities were ignored). 

In line with this previous record now even a more dangerous push is being given for introducing gene edited crops for rice for which permission from foreign companies for their patented technology will have to be taken and which will violate India’s firm resistance so far to the technology of genetic modification for food crops.

India has a good record of standing up for safety of food by opposing GM crops, particularly in the context of food. This is why despite relentless lobbying by powerful corporate groups to introduce GM varieties for food crops like mustard and brinjal, this could be avoided so far and GM crops remained confined in India to cotton (even in the context of GM cotton several false claims have been exposed from time to time). However the authorities have now tried to get over this opposition by introducing gene edited food crops instead but it is unlikely that this tactic will find any takers as in the course of opposition to GM crops it has already been made clear several times that gene edited crops also need to be opposed on substantially similar grounds. 

According to a recent report in The Hindu Business Line titled ‘India’s farmers may grow world’s first gene-edited rice variety this winter’ India is expected to sign an MOU with US-based Corteva which holds the license for the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology. The gene edited variety sought to be promoted is Pusa-DST Rice-1. However earlier the Coalition for GM-free India after examining the claims for gene-edited rice varieties being considered in India had condemned “the hasty promotion of untested, underperforming and unsafe varieties”. In addition 20 agricultural Scientists (Agriculture Scientists Manch or Forum) had warned against the pre-mature release of gene-edited rice citing risks to farmers, biodiversity and seeds sovereignty. Pleas have been made for greater transparency regarding data base of claims and for demanding that the government should bring gene editing under the purview of rigorous regulation. 

While issuing a detailed evidence-based critique of the decision of the government to release one or more gene-edited rice varieties, the Coalition for GM-Free India argued that these have the potential to harm human beings and cause irreversible damage to environment, in addition to threatening our seed sovereignty. The coalition emphasized that it is essential to follow the precautionary approach in this context to avoid serious and irreversible harm. In view also of the threat to gene pool and the diverse indigenous varieties of rice, the coalition stated that public spirited scientists and citizens will together oppose this decision in the days to come. 

It is particularly tragic that such a decision is being taken in the context of rice, which is the most important food crop of India and India is famous for a very rich diversity of indigenous varieties. Dr. R.H. Richharia, India’s most senior rice scientist had worked very closely with farmers of remote villages, including villages of tribal communities in regions like Bastar, to collect and catalogue thousands of indigenous rice varieties and cultivars. If only a proper and detailed study of these thousands of indigenous varieties and cultivars is made, it will be possible to find varieties which can be extremely useful for meeting various desired objectives and characteristics, instead of resorting to the highly uncertain and hazardous techniques of gene modification and editing.

Even from a purely economic perspective, India’s interests are best served as a leading center from where healthy and GM-free rice can be obtained. Understanding this some rice exporters from India have also been keen to oppose to oppose GM-gene editing lobby, as I found them in meeting held to oppose these hazardous technologies. However some powerful foreign interests do not want India to flourish as a center for such healthy, non-GM and diverse rice varieties, and it is under the pressure of such lobbies that such harmful decisions are being taken.   

What is the real game of those lobbying for gene edited crops? As consciousness regarding the many-sided adverse impacts and high hazards and risks of GM crops has grown, some promoters allied to the same big business interests and multinational companies directly and indirectly have instead started trying to push for gene editing technologies but as these too have similar adverse impacts and risks to a large extent therefore these too must be rejected. This is supported by scientific research as well as court decisions. 

In a study published in Nature Biotechnology, scientists from the Wellcome Sanger Institute in the UK found that new genetic engineering techniques like CRISPR may cause ‘genetic havoc’. Researchers found large deletions and rearrangements of DNA near the target site that were not intended. Earlier studies also found that gene-edited plants such as soybeans had off-target effects in which gene-editing occurred at unintended locations. Friends of the Earth found on the basis of the actual applications of these techniques that this was in the direction of further increasing chemical intensive approach to agriculture. 

Gene editing can also be used to construct ‘gene drives’ which aim to spread genetically modified genes across wild populations faster than normal inheritance allows. Once released, gene drive organisms cannot be recalled. This can have very adverse impacts and there have been several demands for moratorium on this. Use of this technology on mosquitoes and insects has proved very controversial and there have been several adverse impacts and high risks reported regarding this.        

In fact the entire trend and tendency of big business interests and multinational companies gaining control over seeds and agriculture must be firmly opposed by farmers, health and environment activists all over the world because big business operates in ways that are harmful for sustainable livelihoods of small farmers, for environment and health. On the one hand they try to spread inherently unstable, unreliable, disruptive and dangerous technologies like GM and gene editing and on the other also market herbicides and agro-chemicals that are expensive as well as harmful for health and environment.

One of the the most eminent scientist of India on this subject Dr. Pushpa Bhargava has clearly stated that the available evidence is overwhelmingly against GM crops. Dr. Pushpa M. Bhargava was the founder of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology and in addition he was also the Vice Chairperson of the National Knowledge Commission. He had been appointed by the Supreme Court of India as an observer in the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee as he was widely perceived to be not only a very accomplished expert on this issue and that too of the highest integrity but in addition he was also seen on the basis of his past record as a very strong and persistent defender of public interest.

Therefore it is very useful and interesting to see what this very senior scientist with a comprehensive understanding of this issue had to say about GM crops in an article written for a leading newspaper The Hindustan Times. He wrote,

“There are over 500 research publications by scientists of indisputable integrity, who have no conflict of interest, that establish harmful effects of GM crops on human, animal and plant health, and on the environment and biodiversity. For example, a recent paper by Indian scientists showed that the Bt gene in both cotton and brinjal leads to inhibition of growth and development of the plant. On the other hand, virtually every paper supporting GM crops is by scientists who have a declared conflict of interest or whose credibility and integrity can be doubted.”

In addition, in a review of recent trends titled ‘Food Without Choice’ (published in another leading newspaper The Tribune) Prof. Pushpa Bhargava drew pointed attention to the “attempt by a small but powerful minority to propagate genetically modified  crops to serve their interests and those of multinational corporations (read the US), the bureaucracy, the political set-up and a few unprincipled and unethical scientists and technologists who can be used as tools.” Further he warned,

“The ultimate goal of this attempt in India of which the leader is Monsanto, is to obtain control over Indian agriculture and thus food production. With 60 per cent of our population engaged in agriculture and living in villages, this would essentially mean not only a control over our food security but also over our farmer security, agricultural security and security of the rural sector.”

The strong stand of Dr. Bhargava against GM crops is supported by other eminent scientists in various parts of world. A group of eminent scientists organized under the Independent Science Panel have stated in very clear terms,

“GM crops have failed to deliver the promised benefits and are posing escalating problems on the farm. Transgenic contamination is now widely acknowledged to be unavoidable, and hence there can be no co-existence of GM and non-GM agriculture. Most important of all, GM crops have not been proven safe. On the contrary, sufficient evidence has emerged to raise serious safety concerns, that if ignored could result in irreversible damage to health and the environment. GM crops should be firmly rejected now.”

A lot of these high risks exist also in the context of gene-edited crops. The enormously powerful billion dollar GMO multinationals, known for innumerable deceptions and falsehoods, tried again to introduce confusion and uncertainty in public mind by coming up with the concept of gene-edited crops and claiming that these should not be subject to the same restrictions as GM crops. However in July 2018 the highest court in Europe ruled that gene-edited crops should be subject to the same strict rules and regulations as GM crops.

Earlier a review of the legal and scientific facts surrounding this debate by Dr. Janet Cotter and Dr. R. Steinbrecher (published in the Ecologist) had concluded,

“It is clear that gene-edited crops and animals need to be assumed as GMOs in the same way as current GM crops.”

The court verdict is along similar lines.

With gene editing researchers can add, delete or modify bits of an organism’s genome. The European Court said that any crops edited using CRISPR or other gene-editing techniques must abide by the same laws restricting the use of GMOs. More specifically the Court concluded it

“considers that the risks linked to the use of these new mutagenesis techniques might prove to be similar to those that result from production and release of a GMO through trans-genesis, since the direct modification of the genetic material of an organism through mutagenesis makes it possible to obtain the same effects as the introduction of foreign gene into the organism (trans-genesis) and these new techniques make it possible to introduce genetically modified varieties at a rate out of all proportion to those resulting from the application of conventional methods of mutagenesis.”   

Welcoming the court verdict Franziska Achterberg, Greenpeace EU’s food policy director said,

“Releasing these new GMOs into the environment without proper safety measures  is illegal and irresponsible, particularly given that gene editing can lead to unintended side-effects… The European Commission and the European governments must now ensure that all new GMOs are fully tested and labeled, and that any field trials are brought under GMO rules.”

A spokesperson of Friends of the Earth said,

“We applaud the European Court of Justice for this forward-looking decision.” 

All these aspects relating to the GM and gene editing technologies along with the opinion of several senior scientists should be very widely spread among people so that the neo-colonialist and imperialist designs to gain increasing control over India’s farming sector can be defeated and if necessary a nationwide satyagraha along Gandhian lines to protect the seeds sovereignty and self-reliance of the farming sector from the onslaughts of multinational companies and big agribusiness companies may be needed. 

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Bharat Dogra is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include India’s Quest for Sustainable Farming and Healthy Food, Man over Machine and Protecting Earth for Children. His website is bharatdogra.in and his YouTube channel is Bharat Dogra| Save Earth Campaign. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.