Hi Everyone, 

You can always count on the Wall Street Journal to come back to the UFO/UAP subject for more debunkery. I think they truly can’t help it. Either that, or someone above them keeps telling them to print this stuff. Here is their latest offering. The damn thing is behind a paywall. However, I was in fact able to read it and I discuss it here in this video. 

It’s typical and predictable. For the YouTube description, I wrote this:

The Wall Street Journal says our UFO “obsession” is distracting us from real national-security threats—and even acknowledges that military and intelligence institutions have sometimes deliberately encouraged UFO hysteria. Fine. But that creates an awkward question. If the UAP discussion is a coordinated psyop to convince us aliens are here, why isn’t one of the establishment’s most powerful propaganda organs on board?

And this is the thing. I am regularly hearing from voices in our alternative truth space that the whole UFO conversation is now a government psyop to make us believe in aliens. I shed a tear the other day when Truthstream Media — oh how I still love them — nevertheless got on that train. They are smart and they have done some great work. But wow they really know nothing about UFOs. That much is obvious.  

There are also voices in the more UFO oriented space that argue versions of this. I usually don’t mention them because I don’t believe in giving them oxygen. I have come to believe that they are doing real damage to this subject and to the public good. 

For generations the USG denied the existence of anomalous UFOs. Guess what? They still do. Just because Elizondo, Mellon, Davis, Grusch and others have said UFO/UAP are real does not equate to a USG endorsement. The Pentagon still denies it. AARO still denies it. The major media such as the WSJ still deny it. I truly don’t understand how thick some people can be. Sorry to sound so pugnacious, but good grief. How much evidence does a person need? 

We are witnessing a factional war. It’s a battle. And by the way, the disclosure advocates, if we can call them that, are still the weaker party in this fight. And people still rip them because maybe they don’t believe in full unvarnished disclosure with all its “catastrophic” effects. Or they don’t like their politics. You are witnessing two sides duke it out, each using what tools they have at their disposal. 

But what we are not witnessing, at least in my considered opinion, is a controlled, managed pseudo disclosure as a single, unified, USG action. There’s a real battle here. That is not to say everyone is telling all they know. Everyone has their own game to play. 

Your thoughts? 

RD